Clarity and Science about Wild vs Stocked Trout, from Halverson’s ‘An Entirely Synthetic Fish,’ and from The Troutlook

by | Sep 8, 2017 | 0 comments

I’m no scientist. I’m not a fisheries biologist or an entomologist — I’m just a fisherman. But you probably sensed that already.

When anyone speaks about the negative effects of stocking hatchery trout over wild trout populations, the inevitable challenge for proof of the matter arises. That’s more than fair. Sure, I can give you first hand accounts about the sad truth, what I’ve seen in decades of hard fishing over both wild and stocked fish, but a curious angler wants more.

I do too, so I’ve followed the works of fisheries biologists, and I’ve sought out and read papers and books on the subject for a long time.

On Troutbitten, I often link to sources like An Entirely Synthetic Fish, by Anders Halverson to provide real research and data because, again, I’m not a scientist. But Shannon White of the Troutlook is.

White’s and Halverson’s work provide honest data on the subject of stocking hatchery trout over wild fish.

Gathering that data is not my job. My job is to educate us all a little about fly fishing, to inspire us to get out there and enjoy a fishing life that ultimately leads to a love so strong that we become conservationists and strong advocates for the future of wild trout, for public lands and clean, cold water.

Photo by Chris Kehres

For those that challenge the idea that stocked trout are no good for wild trout, for those that ask for science-based data, I invite you to follow through and read the information that’s out there.

Yes. Stocking harms wild populations. But don’t take my word for it. Read the science for yourself.

Sure, research and scientific papers aren’t as enjoyable of a read as the latest John Geirach story, but if you are skeptical about the science behind the argument, then you should follow through and read it.

In the latest three articles from the Troutlook, Shannon White lays out the pros, the cons, and some conclusions about her department’s research on the genetic effects of stocking over wild trout populations. It’s very readable and extremely interesting.

Thank you, Shannon.

Halverson's book, An Entirely Synthetic Fish, covers the trout hatchery system from the past to the present, over 130 years. Anders’ work is an entertaining read, full of documented sources, discussing the behavioral and genetic effects of stocking fish over wild trout populations. The bibliography is extensive on the topic at hand.

It’s often repeated that we now live in a post-fact or a post-truth world. No we don’t. Facts are real. And science is real. The entirety of our modern way of living is the result of science: cars, planes, heating and cooling units, the television, my refrigerator and your smart phone. We move forward, we progress as a society, by using scientific research as a means for innovation and for planning the path ahead.

The scientific data on the effects of stocking hatchery trout over wild trout populations should not be ignored.

Enjoy the day.
Domenick Swentosky
T R O U T B I T T E N
domenick@troutbitten.com

Share This Article . . .

Since 2014 and 600 articles deep
Troutbitten is a free resource for all anglers
Your support is greatly appreciated

– Explore These Post Tags –

Domenick Swentosky

Central Pennsylvania

Hi. I’m a father of two young boys, a husband, author, fly fishing guide and a musician. I fish for wild brown trout in the cool limestone waters of Central Pennsylvania year round. This is my home, and I love it. Friends. Family. And the river.

More from this Category

Troutbitten Opinion: Nicholas Meats, LLC vs Fishing Creek

Troutbitten Opinion: Nicholas Meats, LLC vs Fishing Creek

Fishing Creek is currently at risk for drastic increases in groundwater withdrawal by Nicholas Meats, LLC of Loganton, PA.

Troutbitten stands against this proposal and believes this operation will be detrimental to the sustained life of Fishing Creek, as well as the health and welfare of all living things that rely on it.

Please read and understand this dangerous issue, then do something to protect Fishing Creek . . .

What does it take to catch a big trout?

What does it take to catch a big trout?

For many years, I believed that it takes nothing special to catch a big trout. I argued with friends about this over beers, during baseball games, on drives to the river and through text messages at 1:00 am. My contention was always that big trout don’t require anything extraordinary to seal the deal. They need a quality drift, a good presentation, and if they are hungry they will eat it. I frequently pushed back against the notion that big wild trout were caught only with exceptional skill.

So for all who’ve heard me make this argument, I’d like to offer this revision: I still believe that large trout don’t need more than a good presentation. But what is GOOD may actually be pretty special. Meaning, it’s rare to find the skill level necessary to consistently get good drifts and put them over trout (large or small).

Here’s more . . .

Angler Types in Profile: The Gear Guy

Angler Types in Profile: The Gear Guy

I think every angler has some gear obsession. It’s part of us. Because fishing is the kind of activity that requires a lot of stuff. Big things and small. Clothing and boots, packs and boxes, lines and tools — and all the stuff that non-fishers never imagine when they think of a fishing pole. So it’s understandable that we pack our gear bags with stuff we know we need and then add in everything we think we might need. Time on the water is limited, and we want to feel prepared.

But nothing signals rookie more than a clean fisherman.

A Comprehensive List of Fishermen’s Excuses

A Comprehensive List of Fishermen’s Excuses

Fishermen are full of excuses for failure — because we get a lot of practice at not catching fish. Mostly, Troutbitten is here to share better ways to catch trout, but here’s a big list of explanations for when you don’t. Why’d you take the skunk? This list of reasons will help explain it all away.

These excuses can roughly be grouped into three classes:

Conditions — where you blame the weather or the water.
Fish’s Fault — where you blame the fish for not eating your flies.
I Wasn’t Really Trying — these excuses are centered around the inference that if you really wanted to, you could have caught more trout . . .

The Mismanagement of “Class A” Wild Trout

The Mismanagement of “Class A” Wild Trout

It’s time for the fish commission to truly protect, preserve and enhance our wild trout streams, whether that is easy, or whether it’s hard. Stop stocking over all Class A wild trout stream sections.

It’s the right thing to do. And sometimes, that’s where government policy should start . . .

What do you think?

Be part of the Troutbitten community of ideas.
Be helpful. And be nice.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Recent Articles

Recent Posts

Pin It on Pinterest