How We Cover Water (with VIDEO)

by | Nov 15, 2023 | 6 comments

How should we approach a piece of river? What should we cover, and for how long. Should we wade up just one lane or go across the river?

These are all good questions, because a river angler wants to make the most of each piece of water.

Here are a few ideas and guiding principles that work for me every day on my rivers. I don’t try to cover everything. I don’t make grids, but I do make plans. I like to stay creative and follow the signs that trout give me. And for my wading approach, I break things down into three simple strategies: the typewriter, the zig zag and following up one lane.

Watch the video below. Then scroll below, for a little more about each approach.

(Please select 4K or 1080p for best video quality)

If you enjoy this video, the best way to support the effort is to like the video and subscribe on YouTube.

More on This . . .

First, here are three more Troutbitten videos and articles that really pair well with these concepts:

VIDEO: Troutbitten | Reading Water — Levels, Lanes and Seams
VIDEO: Troutbitten | Finding Your Best Fishing Angles
VIDEO: Troutbitten | Casting Forehand and Backhand

The Typewriter Approach

Straight across the river, then reset, move up a bit and go across again. That’s what I call the typewriter approach. It keeps you behind your target trout at all times, so you don’t spook fish before casting to them. It’s a great strategy when other approaches, like following up one lane, might spook the trout on the far bank.

The typewriter is also my favorite approach when dealing with bad light conditions. Looking left or looking right — one is usually much better than the other. And on many days, I’ll work to the left all morning, simply because I can see into the water better. So I’ll work to the left, all the way across the river. Then I’ll reset to the right, move upstream 10-20 feet, and repeat the process.

I do this most often in medium to fast water. Because, in slower water, spooking trout that might go tell their friends about you is a bigger concern. (We call this the Paul Revere effect.)

The Zig Zag Approach

Working across and upstream, getting to the far side and then flipping over to fish the other direction — that’s what I call the zig zag. It uses both your forehand and backhand casting angles. It keeps you moving and covering water most efficiently. That’s why it’s my favorite way to approach the water.

I love the zig zag in pocket water most. But it works great as long as you can wade most of the water. The zig zag is best when like angles allow for looking left and right. And it’s a great way to cover a lot of water quickly and thoroughly.

Follow Up One Lane

When I catch one trout, I expect to catch another one just in front of it. And if the next trout eats the fly just five feet upstream of the first, then I tend to follow that lane all the way up to its origins.

Trout stack up in lanes, and that’s how they see the river — not horizontally, from bank to bank, but vertically, from upstream to downstream. And we see this all the time. One, two, three trout or more in a row, all in the same lane. So whenever the river setup makes it possible, I tend to follow the lane and trust it to the head.

When does this one-lane strategy fail? If I feel like following up just one lane will put me too close to water that I haven’t covered, in neighboring lanes for example, then I revert to the typewriter or zig zag.


As I mentioned in the video above, I like to be creative on the water. I enjoy the flexibility of following the signs of a river. If I get two hits and land a fish in one lane, you can be sure I’m either following that one lane upstream or I’m looking for the next piece of water that is just like it.

After a handful of data points (fish eats) I start to see the river for how it is that day. I learn what is prime water and what might be secondary. And some of the water I simply will not fish. The secondary stuff I’ll spend short time on, as I’m wading to the prime stuff. And when I get to the prime water, I slow down, give it more casts, and I might even change flies or tactics there.

Eventually, if what I thought was prime water produces nothing for a while, then I reset my expectations and start the process anew.

Find feeding fish. That’s the goal out there. And these three strategies for covering water help dial it in.

Fish hard, friends.


** Donate ** If you enjoy this video and you enjoy Troutbitten, please consider a donation. Your support is what keeps this Troutbitten project funded. Scroll below to find the Donate Button. And thank you.


Enjoy the day.
Domenick Swentosky


Share This Article . . .

Since 2014 and 1000+ articles deep
Troutbitten is a free resource for all anglers.
Your support is greatly appreciated.

– Explore These Post Tags –

Domenick Swentosky

Central Pennsylvania

Hi. I’m a father of two young boys, a husband, author, fly fishing guide and a musician. I fish for wild brown trout in the cool limestone waters of Central Pennsylvania year round. This is my home, and I love it. Friends. Family. And the river.

More from this Category

Three Nymphing Questions to Solve Any Problem

Three Nymphing Questions to Solve Any Problem

There are three questions that lead you to solving all your nymphing problems. If you’re struggling, if you’re wondering if the empty net is your fault, ask yourself these questions and answer them honestly.

Is everything in one seam? Do I have to be this far away? Is my fly deep enough for long enough?

Assuming that a dead drift is the goal for your nymph, answering these three questions leads you to correcting your own mistakes . . .

Nymphing: Are We Making Too Much of the Induced Take?

Nymphing: Are We Making Too Much of the Induced Take?

If there’s one thing in nymph fishing that gets far too much credit, it’s the induced take, in all forms. From Frank Sawyer’s slight movement up and out of a pure dead drift, to the Leisenring lift, nymphing anglers everywhere are enamored with ways to twitch, jig, swing and lift the nymph.

An excellent dead drift is your baseline presentation. The induced take is a variation. And do not forget that a good induced take begins with a great dead drift. That is what is so often missed . . .

(VIDEO) What’s In That Vest? Laying Out the Essentials and More

(VIDEO) What’s In That Vest? Laying Out the Essentials and More

The key to a good carrying system is efficiency. Carry lots of gear or be a minimalist. But however you carry your gear, make sure it works for you. Think it through. And then change something if the system is holding you back, if it’s getting in your way or taking you out of rhythm. A carrying system should be designed around the way you fish, and not the other way around. Think about that. Don’t change the way you fish to suit a poorly chosen pack.

My vest is the most important piece of gear that I own. Because it holds everything that I work with. And having things laid out with a purpose keeps me efficient and ready to adapt. 

Three Inches Makes the Difference

Three Inches Makes the Difference

How many times have I assumed that no trout would eat, when all I needed was a different target? How many trout did I pass earlier this morning because I was complacent about my drifts? “Good enough” was my mindset. “Close enough” were my terms, but the trout were on a different page . . .

(VIDEO) The Fly Rod Dip and Swish — A Useful Trick You Might Have Missed

(VIDEO) The Fly Rod Dip and Swish — A Useful Trick You Might Have Missed

What do you do when the fly line to leader connection comes back through your rod guides? How do you get to fly line back out there? And if you’re using a long leader system or a tight line nymphing system, and the butt section of your leader wraps around your rod tip, how do you get it unwrapped?

The fly rod dip and swish. That’s the answer you do. It’s a really useful tool that solves a lot of problems . . .

What do you think?

Be part of the Troutbitten community of ideas.
Be helpful. And be nice.


  1. Great stuff, Dom. Would your strategy change if you had a dry dropper on? For example, when following a seam up, I might stop for a bit and fan my casts out 45 or even 90 degrees, then immediatly return to following my seam up. Or would you call this ineffcient if I didn’t already see a fish further to the side? Thanks, Toney

    • Cool question. As long as I can land both my nymph and the dry in one seam, I might fan the cast out, yes. But I still use these strategies, regardless of the flies or the tactics. How will we cover the water, how will we approach it? Assuming wading is necessary, then these ways to cover it always apply.

      Those are my thoughts.

  2. I like this. I don’t follow one seam nearly enough. Regardless of wether or not I am catching fish the seam or lane that I am not fishing always looks the best.

    What is your preferred approach on streams that are 2 rod lengths or less in width? It seems to me that either the typewriter or single seam are the only viable options.

    As always great video. Thanks!

    • Right on. Narrow water like that, I usually pick the side with the best light angle and just work upstream from that side. No need to get into the middle until you reach some obstruction or are forced into it.

  3. Hi Dom,

    Can you recommend sun glasses for sight fishing


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Articles

Recent Posts

Domenick Swentosky

Central Pennsylvania

Hi. I’m a father of two young boys, a husband, author, fly fishing guide and a musician. I fish for wild brown trout in the cool limestone waters of Central Pennsylvania year round. This is my home, and I love it. Friends. Family. And the river.

Pin It on Pinterest