Nymphing: Three Ways to Dead Drift — Bottom Bounce, Strike Zone, Tracking

by | Jul 26, 2023 | 21 comments

Nymphing is the most complex tactic in fly fishing. A dead drift is the most common goal, but there are three distinct ways to achieve it: bottom bouncing, strike zone rides and tracking the flies. Each of these tactics simulates something that a trout sees every day. And each can fairly be described as a dead drift. But often, just one of these presentations is the most agreeable approach to the trout. And all of them can look like a natural dead drift.

Thinking back to the few primary resources that I consulted about nymphing when I first learned, along with the hundreds more secondary resources since, I realize that very few, if any, of these resources ever brought this distinction to light. Instead, most anglers just said their way was best. They’d spent half their life dedicated to one way of drifting nymphs and were fully bought into their own method. Or maybe they’d moved with the industry trends and followed along with the next new thing. All of this is fair. Because fishing — especially nymphing — is something you can do for decades and still have more questions than answers. So the easy route might be to latch onto something and stick with it, believe in it and push all of your doubts aside.

My life has gone in a way that I’ve had more days along a trout river than most anglers could ever hope for. I’ve also fished primarily for wild brown trout in a region that is so bug rich and temperature stable that it’s a bit of a mystery why a fish would ever eat my fake flies in the first place.

But having been granted those hours and opportunities to learn, I’ve taken them. And when an angler finds himself with enough trout in the net, he starts to wonder how else he might catch a fish. Nymphing presents variables. So we should learn the variations.

**NOTE** Just a quick reminder that every text you see in orange like this, across Troutbitten links to a relevant resource. An in-depth article like this one is only possible because it stands upon the work that precedes it. I’ve been writing about nymphing since 2014, and many of the concepts and ideas in this piece are fleshed out in other articles that set up this one. Here are a few articles that are very relevant:

READ: Troutbitten | Who Knows Better Than You?
READ: Troutbitten | Leading vs Tracking vs Guiding the Flies
READ: Troutbitten | Tight Line Nymphing — Not All That Tight
READ: Troutbitten | Three Nymphing Questions to Solve Any Problem
READ: Troutbitten | When Drifting Low Isn’t Low Enough
READ: Troutbitten | The Water Column and the All-Important Strike Zone

Three Ways

Again, I submit three ways to dead drift a nymph.

One: Getting all the way to the riverbed, touching it with weights or the flies themselves. Many anglers call this bottom bouncing.

Two: Gliding nymphs through the strike zone for as long as possible — the strike zone being a small cushion of water just above the riverbed and maybe just 6-12 inches tall. Let’s call this method strike zone rides.

Three: Casting generally lighter nymphs or weights upstream and letting the river push the flies back downstream. When the river makes more of the decisions than the angler, I call this tracking the flies.

All of these are dead drifts. All of these methods of nymphing can be done with a tight line or with an indicator, although a tight line setup provides more control. And all of these methods can dramatically outpace the other two at any given time. All three are legitimate representations of what a trout sees.

Here’s more . . .

Photo by Bill Dell

Bottom Bouncing

Nymphs spend most of their lives crawling on or attached to river rocks and the submerged tree parts below. These nymphs let go or become dislodged for a variety of reasons: fast currents, bad footing or behavioral drift, to name a few. Once free from the bottom, nymphs try to get back down, unless they are emerging to the surface to hatch. Many nymphs surely touch and go a few times before finding the next solid footing. It’s easy to imagine a mayfly nymph or a cress bug bouncing from rock to rock before touching and finally clinging to a good one. I believe this is partly why the bottom bouncing approach succeeds — because it looks natural. And it can be a good dead drift.

Bottom bouncing also slows the flies. Contact with the riverbed creates a friction that puts the brakes on a bit. It’s a speed slower than the strike zone, although the attached nymphs do spend their time in the strike zone.

A good bottom ride doesn’t stick much. It just taps and ticks along, barely grazing the tops of the rocks. You can tap a dozen times in one drift or just a couple, but the flies or the weight should not scrape and drag the bottom. The nymphs just tumble along, very low and available to every trout holding at the riverbed.

Touching without sticking is its own bit of magic and luck combined. But there’s some skill mixed in too. So, learn to keep the nymphs coming along, and good things will follow.

Rig specifics and fly selection matter here. And the truth is, when I truly want to bounce the bottom, these days I most often choose a drop shot rig. But there are plenty of good ways to achieve similar results with weighted flies only.

Strike Zone Rides

Every one of the aforementioned main resources from which I learned the art of nymphing taught the bottom bouncing approach. All of them.

“Get your nymph on the bottom or you won’t catch a fish.”

“If you ain’t stickin’, you ain’t fishin’.’”

And so I believed this was the only way. It took many years of fishing and one major revelation to realize that I’d been using the bottom as a crutch.

Somewhere in a Joe Brooks book, I think it was, I read about the strike zone. Brooks didn’t use that term. He called it a current of water that was like a separate stream at the bottom of the river. That stream, he said, is where the trout spend most of their time, and so do the bugs and the baitfish. His text didn’t describe gliding through this zone as the goal, but it got me thinking. Why touch the bottom at all then? Why not attempt to drift my nymph in that stream at the bottom of the riverbed? No matter how thin it is, why not make that the goal? Don’t be above the strike zone and don’t be below it (touching the bottom). Just glide the nymph through the strike zone.

That became my mission for the next ten years or so, and like many other anglers before me, I thought I had the one true answer — the magic bullet for nymphing.

Strike zone rides became a lot more doable once I added a sighter to the Mono Rig I was already using. And that colored line changed everything. Because with good contact to the nymphs, I could trust the sighter to show me the speed of the flies. And after the cast, once the sighter slowed, I knew the nymphs were in the strike zone, and it was time to lead. Otherwise they just kept dropping, an dthey  ended up touching bottom in a few more inches anyway — right back to bottom bouncing!

Nymphs of all types — caddis, mayflies stoneflies, midges and crustaceans probably glide through the strike zone more than they bang their heads against the next rock. When they do let go for behavioral drift, when they lose a foothold, they probably glide through that bottom current naturally — in the strike zone.

These days, when I want to glide my nymphs through the strike zone, I choose flies or weights (and a casting style) that will get the nymphs down quickly but will not be too hard to keep off the bottom. I don’t want to waste half my drift on a long drop time if the strike zone is my target.

Strike zone rides are my favorite for one main reason — they’re the most effective. Good strike zone time usually amounts to trout in the net, but it’s the hardest of the three ways to learn and perform consistently. That cushion of water is narrow. It’s hard to read the sighter to perfection. And it’s even harder to learn the exact amount to lead the flies to keep them in the zone without touching the bottom or pulling the nymphs too fast. These variables change with every piece of water.

Photo by Bill Dell

Tracking the Flies

Contact is king. That’s the way I thought about tight line nymphing at first. And for the most part, the adage still holds true. I’d rather lean on the side of more contact than less, for most situations. Because one of the primary advantages that makes tight line principles so effective in the first place is good strike detection. And with less contact, strike detection suffers exponentially.

But as the years passed and I kept nymphing and watching the results, I noticed that some trout would eat on the drop, even more than the drift.

Think about this. Two things happen when your nymph hits the water. It drops to a depth, and then it should (ideally) drift at that depth. When I’m bottom bouncing, I don’t want to waste time with the drop. I’d rather get the nymph to the bottom quickly. Same thing with a strike zone ride. But when I noticed that trout were eating on the drop, it only made sense to extend that drop time. Therefore I started going lighter with my rigs.

Less weight results in a slower drop. So the fly spends more time in the mid-column. And the more we back off the weight, the more the river can dictate the course of the flies rather than the angler. That’s what I call tracking the flies.

This seems like a great idea, and for certain, tracking is the key to success some days. (It works most consistently when bugs are active.) So less weight results in less direct control from the angler and more control from the river — more from the currents. Tracking the flies means there’s less contact. And at first, all of that sounds like it might make for a better dead drift. But it is not better. It’s just another way that flies can look like a natural drift to the trout.

Tracking the flies is the easiest of these three methods to get right. Since the river makes more decisions, we simply try to keep the rig light enough that we have little to no influence over the flies. The drop time is long. The leading is minimal, and we recover the slack that is given to us. We aren’t in charge of the fly’s progress, as with bottom bouncing and with strike zone rides, so we make fewer decisions. Lead speed? Depth? Most of that is up to the river, when we’re tracking. Furthermore, strike detection is simplified. If we are looking for a long drop time, if we are trying not to touch the riverbed, then it’s fair to set on anything unusual from the sighter. That’s another advantage of tracking — another example of how tracking simplifies the process.

There’s one thing to keep in mind, though. No matter how light the fly, how skinny the tippet and how thin the leader, our gear always affects the fly. It will always track toward our rod tip while tight lining and toward the indy or dry fly in a suspension rig. Remember, if the lightest nymph in our box was not attached to a tippet and we dropped it in the water, untethered, it would reach the bottom in a couple of seconds, at most.

While tracking the flies, this is a key point to understand. And I often think about leading the tippet into the right place so that it can be in the best angle not to influence the nymphs themselves any more than necessary.

One, Two, Three

There is no best way to dead drift a nymph, and all three methods are valid and useful. Because, when we think of getting a good drift — a dead drift — on our nymphs, we should also consider the target zone. Is it the bottom, the strike zone or somewhere in the middle? Do we want to have more influence over the flies or less? Each of these methods looks a lot like something trout see daily. This is the big difference between nymphing and fishing dry flies. Do you want to get a dead drift on a dry? Give it some slack so it can match the surface current speed. With a dry fly, there’s one way. But with the complexity of currents in three dimensions underneath the water, the nymphing angler has more decisions to make, more techniques to consider and a bigger puzzle to solve.

Let the trout and their rivers be your guide. Learn which method gains the most response from trout in different scenarios. Test things out. Work on your deficiencies and satisfy your curiosities by fishing all three of these methods. Then you can answer more questions on the river.

Fish hard, friends.

 

** Donate ** If you enjoy this article, please consider a donation. Your support is what keeps this Troutbitten project funded. Scroll below to find the Donate Button. And thank you.

 

Enjoy the day.
Domenick Swentosky
T R O U T B I T T E N
domenick@troutbitten.com

 

Share This Article . . .

Since 2014 and 1000+ articles deep
Troutbitten is a free resource for all anglers.
Your support is greatly appreciated.

– Explore These Post Tags –

Domenick Swentosky

Central Pennsylvania

Hi. I’m a father of two young boys, a husband, author, fly fishing guide and a musician. I fish for wild brown trout in the cool limestone waters of Central Pennsylvania year round. This is my home, and I love it. Friends. Family. And the river.

More from this Category

VIDEO: The Golden Ratio of Nymphing

VIDEO: The Golden Ratio of Nymphing

One rod length over and two rod lengths up. That’s the Golden Ratio. That’s the baseline, and it’s where trust in our drift begins. There are surely moments and situations that call for something different. But a good tight line style starts here, within the Golden Ratio of nymphing . . .

PODCAST: Critical Nymphing Concepts #6 — Line On the Water — S10, Ep6

PODCAST: Critical Nymphing Concepts #6 — Line On the Water — S10, Ep6

This episode is about tension and slack. It’s about how we manage fly lines and leaders on the water while nymphing. My friend, Austin Dando, joins me to walk through the tight line advantage of keeping line off the water and what happens when we give that up. Fishing greater distances often requires laying line on the water, and how we manage that line, how we plan for it, makes all the difference between a great drift and a poor one . . .

Hi-Vis Leader Material for Mono Rigs

Hi-Vis Leader Material for Mono Rigs

The performance between Hi-Vis monofilaments varies widely. Here are the properties I want most, and here are my favorite lines.

There are many options for hi-vis mono, but my preferences are specific. And for so long, I couldn’t find anything that checked all the boxes . . . until now.

PODCAST: Critical Nymphing Concepts #5 — Weight: The Fundamental Factor — S10, Ep5

PODCAST: Critical Nymphing Concepts #5 — Weight: The Fundamental Factor — S10, Ep5

Once you leave the water’s surface, weight is necessary for the presentation. Here’s what weights to choose, for nymphing, why and when. You can’t avoid it. Weight is the fundamental factor. Meaning, it’s probably more important than the fly itself. More weight or less is more consequential than what dubbing, feather or ribbing is wound around the hook shank.

We use all types of weight, and there are good reasons for all of these: tungsten beads, split shot and drop shot . . .

What do you think?

Be part of the Troutbitten community of ideas.
Be helpful. And be nice.

21 Comments

  1. Excellent, again. Thank you. Your articles often remind me that I’m lumping things together, or missing distinctions that I could be making out there.

    Reply
  2. This is a very important article that needs to be read and reread by anglers who wish to improve their nymphing. Thanks.

    Reply
  3. Another great article as always and spot on with the break down. The way I tie my nymphs breaks down those 3 ways as well to match right along with the methods.

    I personally feel like I’ve really fished well if I can catch them all 3 ways on nymphs – and not from forcing the tactics, but by covering water and adapting to whats in front. But having the right wherewithall between my ears to put all that together can be elusive at times.. so they turn into proud moments. Oh the little things.

    Reply
  4. Completely agree with what you have written here. You have a great way of structuring the strategies into frameworks that help us think about these things. I have had many days where only one of the three types of dead drifts work and it can be quite surprising how even small adjustments to the drift can dramatically impact the number of fish you catch. The way I like to think about it is that fish position themselves to feed from a specific set of currents or even one current in 3D space. The less aggressive they are the fewer currents they will key on. The currents are like conveyor belts of food and fish position themselves so it is easy to feed off a primary conveyor belt. Which current(s) seems dependent on environmental conditions and which food source is active. But, for me, trial and error, working top to bottom, is often the only way of figuring that out. In my mind, I am always trying to get my nymph to ride that key current because if I can do that a decent dead drift should bring the nymph straight to the fish. To do that I am always making adjustments to nymph weight, nymph water resistance, lead angle and the amount of slack line I allow in the tippet. Sometimes and extra 12”-24” of slack seems to allow the nymph to ride a specific current better because, I think, some sub-surface currents are not moving in a straight line relative to the direction of the lead or the currents you see on the surface. It is pretty much what you say about tracking the flies but I have found adjustments in slack can sometimes make a difference even when fishing heavier nymphs targeting a strike zone ride or bottom bouncing. In those cases I will maintain contact to help the nymph reach the strike zone faster and then introduce the slack.

    Reply
    • Good stuff. As a trade off to adding slack, that slack can easily be taken into adjoining currents at different speeds too. So with too much contact, we might miss the subtleties of lanes down there, but with to little contact and too much slack nymphs still get pulled off course and we have less strike detection.

      Ha. I wonder why we ever catch a trout.

      Reply
      • Absolutely. The slack is a sail and sometimes it helps and sometimes it hurts. When you are fairly sure fish are holding in an area and you aren’t catching them it often becomes nothing more clever than try everything til something works. However my first priority is always to figure out how to put that nymph on the trout’s nose.

        Reply
        • When Nymph speed is the secrete in faster waters and a narrow window to where you feel that fish is lying I will staircase my mends 2 to 4 times.

          Reply
      • Great stuff Dom. I would suggest that a single drift is not exclusive to one dead drifting style.

        I find many of my drifts start with a ‘tight’ tracking approach, and transition to a strike zone ride. Sometimes that strike zone ride turns into an occasional bottom bounce.

        Refinement and variation. That’s fly fishing.

        Tight lines.

        Miles.

        Reply
        • Thanks Miles,

          Many good things to thing about here. I know what you mean, that some drifts start out as one thing and end up as another. But I would suggest avoiding what you describe. Instead, I like to choose one style — to know what my goal is and make it happen. As I mentioned in the article, a good bottom bouncing approach doesn’t happen accidentally, and I don’t want to waste time on a long drop, because my drifts just can’t be all that long. Likewise, I want to get into that strike zone within just a couple seconds, if the strike zone is my goal. Finally, while tracking, I simple do not want to touch the bottom. If I am very much, then I feel I’m doing something wrong, and I’ll make adjustments. However, I do slip into the strike zone a lot while tracking, and that’s just fine with me.

          Overall, that’s just the way I like to do it. I like to be very intentional about where I’m fishing the nymph. And I’m sure you have good reasons for what you are describing. Everything works sometimes.

          Cheeers.
          Dom

          Reply
          • Thanks Dom, I’ll keep that in mind. One drift, one style.

            Many of my drifts are strike zone rides. That’s just what the fish want. Most of the time…. I’m sure this is nothing new for Troutbitten anglers.

            When the fly is dropping, I’d say we are tracking; no matter the style. I find variation in the position of the flies in the column during the ‘guide’. There are the styles, and usually the weight.

            Miles.

          • “When the fly is dropping, I’d say we are tracking; no matter the style.”

            Not a bad way to think about it.

            Cheers.
            Dom

  5. This makes sense as to what I have been learning this year. I’ve noticed that often trout will take the fly quickly after it enters the water and this was confusing to me since I’ve mostly heard and read that they need to be on the bottom. Now I see why they have been taking the fly this way! Brilliant! Thanks for putting out this info. I’m so glad I stumbled on your stuff this year. Game. Changer.

    Reply
  6. Awesome article. Just a quick question though:

    Say you’re tight line nymphing and drifting your nymph across the river so its in line with your body, perpendicular to the current, but far out from the tip of your rod.
    Doesn’t the angle from your rod tip to the nymph influence the fly to travel to a different current, sort of like skating a caddis across the river?
    I’ve seen it done like this and was wondering if I am missing something or if the hydraulics of the river keep the nymph in the same lane.

    Thanks and sorry if this isn’t explained well.

    Reply
    • Hi James,

      That’s a great point, and I’ve written about this many times. If the flies aren’t in one seam, they cannot dead drift. A true dead drift starts and finished in just one lane. Real nymphs aren’t down there swimming across seams and lanes all day. And as you acknowledged, YES, those nymphs absolutely do track toward your rod tip, NO MATTER how skinny the leader is. Also, yes, you will find a lot of anglers doing this. But you will find the most successful anglers avoiding the cross stream situation as much as possible. We talk about this a lot, being just one rod length over. Here’s the first article I wrote about it, many years ago:

      https://troutbitten.com/2016/06/08/one-great-nymphing-trick/

      Cheers.
      Dom

      Reply
    • Edit:

      I’ve looked into it a bit more and I am correct.
      I wonder why I always see people fishing farther than the rod tip.

      Reply
      • I think it’s simply because they see other anglers doing it. And bad form is spread quickly when it’s an easier approach.

        Cheers.
        Dom

        Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Articles

Recent Posts

Domenick Swentosky

Central Pennsylvania

Hi. I’m a father of two young boys, a husband, author, fly fishing guide and a musician. I fish for wild brown trout in the cool limestone waters of Central Pennsylvania year round. This is my home, and I love it. Friends. Family. And the river.

Pin It on Pinterest