Natural vs Attractive Presentations

by | Apr 21, 2021 | 13 comments

I’ve been fishing with Smith for over a decade now. And when we first met, he was an inexperienced but eager angler with a pile of questions. Much of what he knew about fly fishing at the time had been learned intuitively, from time spent on the water answering his own questions formed from a non-stop curious mind.

Like all the good anglers that I know, Smith is intellectual about the process, but he also appreciates the beauty and artistry of our craft. He’s content enough just to catch a few fish among the majesty of a winter canyon, yet he’s relentless enough to search and wonder how he can improve the technique and catch more fish. There are two sides to every fisherman, and Smith has a wonderful balance to it all.

Long ago, on one of our first trips together, I caught up to Smith in a knee-deep limestone green run. He was angled downstream and wading methodically through the fast water. Though not in a hurry, Smith had covered a ton of the river since I’d seen him a few hours ago, and I wasn’t even sure it was him until I got close enough to see his tall, six-six form throwing fly line loops that reflected the last rays of direct light. The sun ducked behind the westside mountain of oaks and hemlocks just as I approached to find Smith swinging wet flies. It was his favorite tactic back then, and Smith was good at it.

I watched his loops for a while and waited for my friend to notice me standing bankside off his casting shoulder. When he didn’t, I grew impatient. So I picked up an old dry log about the size of a baseball bat and tossed it in the water above him. He startled when it landed, and he jumped a bit. It’s funny to see a big man like that in the grip of fear, if just for a half second.

Smith knew where the log had come from, so he refused to look back at me. He ignored it when it bumped against his leg. And he pretended it didn’t exist when the big stick nearly caught his fly line laying downstream in the water.

“Slow day,” Smith bellowed in my direction. “I’ve only caught two since I saw you last.”

I could hear the expectation in my friend’s voice. He wishfully wanted me to volunteer that my own fishing had been similar. But I couldn’t. Because I’d found a trout or two in every pocket and in nearly every seam that I’d cast to. The drifts had to be dead on, but when they were, so were the trout.

“I think it’s your presentation,” I stated flatly.

Smith stopped casting and turned to look my way for the first time. He grasped the leader and dangled his pair of wet flies. Then he put both hands against his broad hips.

“Go ahead,” Smith replied. “I can take it. What am I doing wrong now?”

Smith and I had been through a number of these moments. With most of my fishing friends, I never offer unsolicited advice. But since I’d met him, Smith was on a mission to shorten his learning curve, and he’d put much of what I’d shown him to immediate use.

“Well . . .” I paused and dragged out the moment, just to mess with Smith a bit. Then I grabbed another dead log and flung it in the water above him. “You’re fishing an attractive technique, but these fish want a natural presentation.”

Smith plucked the dead log from the water as it passed him, and he whipped it hard so it landed at my feet.

“Now what the hell does that mean?” he asked.

Here’s what I told Smith . . .

Natural or Attractive

Let’s call it natural if the fly is doing something the trout are used to seeing. If the fly looks like what a trout watches day after day and hour after hour — if the fly is doing something expected — that’s a natural presentation.

By contrast, let’s call it attractive if the fly deviates from the expected norm. Like any other animal in the wild, trout know their environment. They understand what the aquatic insects and the baitfish around them are capable of. They know the habits of mayflies and midges, of caddis, stones, black nosed dace and sculpins. And just as an eagle realizes that a woodland rabbit will never fly, a trout knows that a sculpin cannot hover near the top of the water column with its nose in heavy current.

So if you choose to fish your sculpin pattern in such a manner, it’s an attractive presentation. It literally attracts the attention of a trout because it’s unusual. Does that mean a trout will eat the fly? Well, sometimes. But it depends on the trout. And it depends on the situation.

This Trout and That One

Anglers often don’t want to believe this, but the trout in my home region can be far more difficult to catch than just about anywhere else that I’ve fished. The easy assumption is that selectivity is a result of angler pressure. But that’s not it. These trout are especially selective because they feed every day of the year, and they have a ton of food in front of them. There is no off seasons here. In other regions and rivers that have large temperature swings, the feeding season is much shorter. So the trout eat now or die later. (Alaska is a good example.) However, the trout here have an abundance of food, and they live in temperatures favorable for feeding every day of the year.

Another huge factor is wild vs stocked. Wild fish eat as they should and they grow as nature intended. But most stocked trout are genetically selected to feed aggressively and grow quickly. They are simply more eager. The old adage that a stocked trout becomes “just like a wild trout” once it’s been in the water for a while is false. They surely become more like their wild brothers, but if they are from hatchery stock then their genes never change — they will always feed more aggressively and grow more quickly.

So, trout in areas with a shorter feeding season are more apt to take an attractive presentation than trout that feed 365. Likewise, a stocked trout, bred to feed aggressively, is more likely to take an attractive presentation than its wild counterpart.

READ: Troutbitten |Does a Stocked Trout Ever Become Wild?

Examples

Determining what is natural vs attractive is as easy as considering the food forms themselves.

Dead drifts are natural presentations for dry flies and nymphs, because that’s what the naturals do. True drifts follow one seam, unaltered by the attached tippet. They glide down a single lane, in step with the current speed, just like the naturals. And trout know it.

There are certainly variations, and that’s what makes things interesting. Adult caddis may dap on the surface to lay eggs or collect a drink, so slashing trout may respond to a hopping CDC and Elk fished on a tight line dry dropper rig. Likewise, when mayflies are emerging, a dead drifted nymph that finishes with a short (or long) lift of the artificial in the water may be just the trigger that trout are looking for. These minor variations on a dead drift are still within the realm of a natural presentation.

But swinging a nymph across and against the currents is not natural. No nymph has the propulsion system to fight a strong current and hold its position or swing across. And a dragging dry fly may fool a few small fish, but it’s a poor imitation for the natural.

Swung wet flies is a great example of an attractive presentation. In most cases, the swinging wet is not a natural look, yet over the right trout and in the right situation, it’s a presentation that can fool a lot of fish.

Performed with skill and intention, a brace of wets can look very much like emerging insects. But the way most anglers swing wets causes the flies to race across seams in a manner that no real insect could ever duplicate. And outside of the presence of hatching insects, even the best wet fly swing is an attractive look rather than a natural one.

Similarly, the streamer game is full of popular and common retrieves that look like nothing trout see in nature. Sometimes these attractive presentations fool fish, but just as often, a more natural look is the better choice.

READ: Troutbitten | Streamers as an Easy Meal — The Old School Streamer Thing

Again, the key is to consider the baitfish you are imitating. A crayfish cannot and does not swim from one bank to the next, riding mid-column, without stopping. Likewise, sculpins are poor swimmers, and they have completely different habits than dace or small trout.

I’m not suggesting here that attractive presentations produce fewer trout than natural ones — not always. I’ve caught plenty of trout with my sculpin imitation fished fast in the top of the water column. Trout eat it — sometimes. And I do not suggest that trout have the brainpower to consider how a crayfish should swim, but they are surely conditioned to what they see in their natural surroundings.

Yes, trout eat attractive stuff sometimes. And yet . . . there are many days when the same trout simply will not take an attractive look from any type of fly. Sometimes trout want it natural or nothing.

Which One?

If you are fishing for trout that fall head over tail for an attractive look, then do it! Attractive presentations are arguably easier to accomplish, and the angler can usually cover more water with each cast.

But if the catching is slow, then pause to consider if what you are doing with the fly is natural or attractive. What do the real food forms do?

Fish always with intention. Understand the trout’s prey, and be aware of your presentation of choice — is it a true imitation, or does it deliberately deviate from the natural standard?

Fish hard, friends.

Subscribe to Troutbitten and follow along. (It’s free.)

** Donate ** If you enjoy this article, please consider a donation. Your support is what keeps this Troutbitten project funded. Scroll below to find the Donate Button. And thank you.

 

Enjoy the day.
Domenick Swentosky
T R O U T B I T T E N
domenick@troutbitten.com

 

Share This Article . . .

Since 2014 and 700+ articles deep
Troutbitten is a free resource for all anglers.
Your support is greatly appreciated.

– Explore These Post Tags –

Domenick Swentosky

Central Pennsylvania

Hi. I’m a father of two young boys, a husband, author, fly fishing guide and a musician. I fish for wild brown trout in the cool limestone waters of Central Pennsylvania year round. This is my home, and I love it. Friends. Family. And the river.

More from this Category

Fishing With Kids — The Independence Marker

Fishing With Kids — The Independence Marker

At thirteen years old, he has enough experience with the woods and water that I don’t think twice about dropping him off to fish for the evening, awaiting his call when he’s either fished out or it’s getting dark. When I pick him up, he’s full of excitement and stories, or he is calm and peaceful in a way that I don’t often see him. I let him be, in those times, and allow the experience for him to soak in, as he processes a return to the world after a long outing. Leaving the water to rejoin life is sometimes a hard turn.

Kids soak in the rhythms of nature. And later in life, maybe around twelve years old, that base of experience pays off . . .

Night Fishing for Trout –The Wiggle and Hang

Night Fishing for Trout –The Wiggle and Hang

Lifting the rod slightly, I shake the rod tip left and right. Easy, rhythmically, I wiggle the tip and feel the line wave as I see it dance and glow in the dark. The fly shimmies and sends a pattern of waves through the surface and beyond, calling to any trout within who-knows-how-far.

May We Have the Hook Dimensions, Please?

May We Have the Hook Dimensions, Please?

So, if there will be no industry standard on sizing and strength for hooks (and there won’t be), can we at least have the dimensions for each hook that we’re sold? Give us the measurements: hook length, wire diameter, gap width. Why is this so hard?

. . . Given the proliferation of hook brands — many of high quality — this seems the only logical thing to do. Give your buyer the information. Tell them what they are buying. This is the information age, friends! Yes, we can handle this!

#7. Guiding the Flies: Nine Essential Skills for Tight Line and Euro Nymphing

#7. Guiding the Flies: Nine Essential Skills for Tight Line and Euro Nymphing

We overweight to lead the flies, and we underweight to track them. But to guide the flies, we must find the middle ground, with enough weight to control the flies against the effects of the current but not so much that the flies cannot be permitted to drift at the will of that same current.

This may sound like a bit of hocus pocus. But in truth, it’s an intuitive process that becomes natural with trial and error . . .

Following Through

Following Through

This morning should have been like any other. Kill the alarm and hate life for the first five minutes as my body begrudgingly catches up to the will of ambition. Coffee helps. So does the routine, because the inevitability of repetition and pattern seems certain. It cannot be challenged. So, no, you cannot go back to bed. Go fishing . . .

What do you think?

Be part of the Troutbitten community of ideas.
Be helpful. And be nice.

13 Comments

  1. Dom, you described what all fishers should fundamentally understand. Is it natural or attractive? Something I understood when bass fishing while growing up, but had not considered for trout. Thanks for broadening my knowledge.

    Reply
  2. I like how you compare the two in terms of presentation rather than pattern style , more to consider.Anothet great artical Dom, thanks again! Pete

    Reply
  3. This is a very valuable article. I can’t begin to describe the number of fishermen I meet swinging wets or nymphs in fast water and claiming to be imitating emergers. If they are, then these emergers are using some major performance-enhancing drugs.

    Reply
  4. Great article and certainly and easy comparison to understand. I fish a tailwater in Ar, so I can certainly relate to the selective feeding patterns. The tough part for me sometimes is in really listening to what the fish are telling me and when I need to change up my presentation – whether it be from attractor to natural, or a varying of the natural presentation.

    Reply
  5. This information would behoove us to become more knowledgeable about the behaviors of the different aquatic insects that trout feed on, especially the particulars regarding the movement of nymphs and pupa when emerging.

    I still have my copy of “The Art of Tying the Wet Fly & Fishing the Flymph” by James Leisenring and Vernon S. Hidy that I bought back in 1971 ($4.50). Would you classify the ‘Leisenring Lift’ as a natural or attractive presentation? Just trying to fine tune this very interesting cocept.

    Reply
    • The lift is either/or, in my opinion. It depends both on the current bug activity and how it is executed.

      Cheers.
      Dom

      Reply
  6. Great stuff. Always learn something new or forgotten.

    Reply
  7. Dominic I am re-reading Leonard Wright’s Fishing the Dry Fly as a Living Insect which makes the largely the same argument as your article. Skating the occasional midge this winter when the trout wouldn’t budge, proved to me the value of this concept. Looking forward to the Caddis hatch.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Articles

Recent Posts

Domenick Swentosky

Central Pennsylvania

Hi. I’m a father of two young boys, a husband, author, fly fishing guide and a musician. I fish for wild brown trout in the cool limestone waters of Central Pennsylvania year round. This is my home, and I love it. Friends. Family. And the river.

Pin It on Pinterest