Thoughts on Rod Tip Recovery

by | Jul 19, 2020 | 6 comments

I’m about to give opinions and use layman’s terms that might make rod designers squirm. Anyone who holds both a fly rod and a degree in physics would certainly describe this topic with more eloquence and accuracy than me. I have a fisherman’s understanding of how rod tip flex and recovery affects both the cast and the drift. I fish hard. And I think a lot. Maybe that’s enough.

Let’s talk about it . . .

Gear Junkies Anonymous

I was never a gear guy. My friend, Sawyer, marveled at how little I cared about fly rods and reels. For leaders, tippets, and tools like hemostats and split shot: Yes, all of that mattered a lot. But the means for delivery (the rods) and the means for recovery (the reels) were near the bottom of my list. This drove Sawyer crazy. How could I not care about the amazing sensitivity of the latest graphite composite in his new rod? And couldn’t I feel the smoothness of this drag compared to my one-hundred dollar reel?

READ: Troutbitten | What to Spend On and What to Skimp On

In truth, I was never a gear guy, because I couldn’t afford to be. I sunk my money into waders and wading boots. Because those items kept me on the water, day after day. I always had a good vest, too, because it was important to be efficient — right from the start.

But the fly rod itself? Meh. I had what I needed. Two rods: a Redington 7.5 foot 4 weight, and a St. Croix Avid 8.5 foot 5 weight. I caught so many trout on those rods that I laughed at the notion that a more expensive rod would put more fish in the net.

My first taste of high-end gear was a Sage Z-Axis 9.5 foot 4 weight. I bought it from a (very generous) friend for a couple-hundred dollars. And I was immediately impressed — stunned, really — by the performance. The extra length and reach was one thing. But there was something intangible about the Z-Axis that made casting an intuitive experience. I knew where the line and the fly would go. My connection from cork to tip to fly was complete.

Back then, it was indescribable. But now, many years later, I can put my finger on it. The tip of the Z-Axis is what worked for me.

Good fly rods are all about the tip. I guess bad ones are too. And now, after casting almost every trout rod on the market, it seems, I can feel the differences almost immediately.

I played acoustic guitar as a career for sixteen years. And if you put a six-string in my hands and blindfolded me, I could tell you a lot about the quality of the guitar after playing five chords. It doesn’t take many more casts than that to get a sense for a fly rod. Quality is immediately apparent. And understanding what the rod is all about — whether it’s built for power, sensitivity or something else — is revealed just as easily.

But let’s get back to the tip for a minute. Assuming the fly rod has enough backbone in the butt section, then fly rod evaluation usually comes down to how much the tip flexes and how quickly it recovers. The latter is more important than the former.

Photo by Bill Dell


Flex matters, of course. But a lot of it comes down to preference.

I like a fast or medium-fast tip, because I just don’t want to wait the extra milliseconds for a slower rod to load — I have things to do, man.

I cast with speed and crisp stops, because I turn everything over before it hits the water, ninety-five percent of the time. I also learned to fly fish on brookie streams choked with mountain laurel. And without a fast and tight stroke, I was toast.

READ: Troutbitten | Ten and Two

But, setting my preference for faster action aside, I can make a slow rod work just fine. It takes a few minutes to find the new rhythm. And while I don’t necessarily like it, I can slow myself down. There’s nothing wrong with slower rods.


But rod tip recovery is another matter. A poorly designed rod is a liability on the stream. A tip that shakes and shudders for too long after the cast makes for an inaccurate rod. It’s also a horrible choice for contact techniques such as euro nymphing or tight lining.

I define rod tip recovery as how fast or slow a rod tip comes back to a standstill after the cast. (I don’t know how the rod builders define it.)

Cast the rod and watch it flex. Now see how long it takes for the rod tip to stop shaking. Watch for a complete stop, all the way to a standstill — not just the big motions, but the minor shuddering at the end too.

Good rods recover quickly. They may be fast or slow. They may be built for power or subtlety, but they recover quickly. They return to their original form in short order.

Photo by Bill Dell

Why Does It Matter?

For me, there are two main reasons why rod recovery is paramount.

First, rod recovery is a big factor in accuracy. Casting is the process of flexing and unflexing the rod. There are changes of direction. And when the tip returns to straight quickly, that tip is ready to do the next thing. By contrast, a poorly designed rod is still recovering when the next direction is set in motion. So accuracy suffers, because our intuition for where the line goes is gone. Such a rod is unpredictable. It’s a struggle to cast well.

Second, a rod with poor recovery shakes after the cast. So, as the drift begins, the rod tip is still settling — sometimes for as long as a few seconds.

This is harmful in any style, but it’s most detrimental in a contact system. Watch your sighter in a tight line nymphing rig. A good dead drift happens only if the sighter is stable, with no wobble or shake — because everything the sighter does is translated to the nymphs. You might assume that it’s your hand or arm that dictates the stability of the sighter, but the rod tip recovery has a lot to do with a good drift, especially in the first few seconds.

READ: Troutbitten | Tight Line Nymphing — Drift With a Stable Sighter

The best rods flex, unflex and return to the original shape — lickety split. So the sighter and the nymphs drift without influence from any bouncing, because the rod tip recovers quickly.

There are a handful of rod companies that have cropped up in the last few years. They offer lower price points, clever model names and a big social media presence. They also come with poor rod tip recovery times. They are inaccurate and unpredictable. And these rods make riding with a stable sighter a much greater challenge than it should be.

Sawyer was right. There’s a lot more to good gear than I ever thought. Luckily, the lower end tools that I learned on were good pieces. (I had solid advice from the local fly shop owner.) These days, I’m in a position to have my hands on a ton of great rods. And oh my, the differences are far greater than I ever imagined.

Rod tip recovery is the defining characteristic of a quality fly rod versus a mediocre one.

Fish hard, friends.

** For a list of my favorite fly rods, visit the Recommended Gear page here on Troutbitten. **


Enjoy the day.
Domenick Swentosky


Share This Article . . .

Since 2014 and 600 articles deep
Troutbitten is a free resource for all anglers
Your support is greatly appreciated

– Explore These Post Tags –

Domenick Swentosky

Central Pennsylvania

Hi. I’m a father of two young boys, a husband, author, fly fishing guide and a musician. I fish for wild brown trout in the cool limestone waters of Central Pennsylvania year round. This is my home, and I love it. Friends. Family. And the river.

More from this Category

Dry Fly Fishing — The Forehand and Backhand Curve

Dry Fly Fishing — The Forehand and Backhand Curve

Learning to use the natural curve that’s present in every cast produces better drag free drifts than does a straight line.

It takes proficiency on both the forehand and backhand.

I’ve seen some anglers resist casting backhand, just because it’s uncomfortable at first. But, by avoiding the backhand, half of the delivery options are gone. So, open up the angles, understand the natural curve and get better drag free drifts on the dry fly . . .

Stabilize the Fly Rod with the Forearm

Stabilize the Fly Rod with the Forearm

A steady and balanced sighter is important from the beginning, because effective tight line drifts are short. But there’s one overlooked way to stabilize the sighter immediately — tuck the rod butt into the forearm.

Here’s how and why . . .

Tight Line and Euro Nymphing: Tracking the Flies

Tight Line and Euro Nymphing: Tracking the Flies

Regardless of the leader choice, angle of delivery, or distance in the cast, every tight liner must choose whether to lead, track or guide the flies downstream. So the question here is how do you fish these rigs, not how they are put together.

Good tracking is about letting the flies be more affected by the current than our tippet. Instead of bossing the flies around and leading them downstream, we simply track their progress in the water.

Tracking is the counterpoint to leading. Instead of controlling the speed and position of the nymphs through the drift, we let the flies find their own way . . .

A Simple Slidable Foam Pinch-On Indy

A Simple Slidable Foam Pinch-On Indy

One of the joys of fly fishing is problem solving. There are so many tools available, with seemingly infinite tactics to discover, it seems like any difficult situation on the water can be solved. Perhaps it can. For those anglers who search for answers in tough moments, the prospect of solving a puzzle builds lasting hope into every cast. And after seasons on the water, the game becomes not how many trout we can catch, but how many ways those trout can be caught. Then, when presented with conditions that chase fair-weather fishers off the water, we rise to the moment with a tested solution, perfectly adapted and suited for the variables at hand.

There is not one way. There are a hundred ways. And the best anglers are prepared with all of them.

One of them is the slidable foam pinch on indy . . .

Tight Line and Euro Nymphing: How to Lead the Flies

Tight Line and Euro Nymphing: How to Lead the Flies

Leading does not mean we are dragging the flies downstream. In fact, no matter what method we choose (leading, tracking or guiding), our job is to simply recover the slack that is given to us. We tuck the flies upstream and the river sends them back. It may seem like there is just one way to recover that slack. But there are at least two distinct methods — leading and tracking.

Let’s talk more about leading . . .

What water type? Where are they eating?

What water type? Where are they eating?

Fast, heavy, deep runs have always been my favorite water type to fish. I can spend a full day in the big stuff. I love the mind-clearing washout of whitewater. No average sounds penetrate it. And the never ending roar of a chunky run is mesmerizing. I also enjoy the wading challenge. The heaviest water requires not just effort, but a constant focus and a planned path to keep you upright and on two feet. Constant adjustment is needed to stay balanced, and one slip or misstep ends up in a thorough dunking. It reminds me of the scaffold work I did on construction crews in my twenties. I always enjoyed being a few stories up, because the workday flew by. When every movement means life or death, you’d better stay focused. I always liked that . . .

What do you think?

Be part of the Troutbitten community of ideas.
Be helpful. And be nice.


  1. Dom,

    I haven’t bought a premium rod since I paid $325 for a Sage RPL in 1993. I rebelled when Sage rods started to cost $600, but this article has me rethinking my strategy.

    I recently bought a 9′ 5 weight for under $200 that was made by a fairly new company, and I was just outside casting it. I noticed that the tip stopped vibrating long before the line hit the grass. Is that an adequate rate of recovery? Is there a better test for it? Is a side by side comparison of different rods the best way to test tip recovery?

    Best regards

    • Hi Tim.

      That’s a pretty good question. I don’t know how to answer it for sure. But that sounds fine, yes. The rods I would complain about take over a second or two to fully settle down. Of course, there are other factors too. But hey, if the rod works for you and you are accurate, then that’s your rod. Enjoy it.

      I have a number of rods in the 200 dollar range that are excellent.


  2. Tip recovery is all about economics. I don’t have a lot of money, so when I cast my tip off I recover it in a hurry. If I had more funds I might be willing to chance that my fly will dutifully catch the tip for me as it does on so many of my casts. Also, In this regard 2 piece rods are far superior to 4 piece for obvious reasons.

    • I have been using the medium priced competition nymph rods made by Cortland and have been happy with the performance both contact nymphing and tight line indy fishing . The price point fit my budget. I am ready to upgrade but not until the manufacturers include a both a down locking reel seat and a hook keeper. Both features are included in the current Cortland nymph series at
      More than half the cost of higher end rods reviewed. Great article. I learned a lot and will eventually upgrade

    • This is everything. A+

  3. After reading today’s thoughts, had to go cast a old Fenwick 7wt, 2 pc 8′ fiberglass rod. Had to laugh….there was little to “no” rodtip recovery. Only if the drift is long enough, she might settle down some before executing another cast! Ha. Hopefully, newer glass rods recover quicker than my old dinosaur. But She’s a great streamer rod tho.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Recent Articles

Pin It on Pinterest