Add 146 PA Streams to the Class-A Wild Trout and Wild Trout Streams Lists

by | Mar 16, 2017 | 7 comments

A slate of 146 streams are proposed to be added to the Pennsylvania Class A Wild Trout Waters and Wild Trout Streams lists, but they need your help.

Surprisingly, streams that have trout populations meeting the Class A requirement are not automatically designated as such. And on April 24th the PFBC will vote on whether to add each of these streams to the Class A Wild Trout and Wild Trout Streams lists.

Streams on the Class A list receive special protection against the influences of development and industry. That’s not only good for trout and fishermen, but good for clean water and public health too.

The PFBC provides a period for public comment, and that deadline is almost here. Before March 20, 2017, please take five minutes to fill out the online form for comment on proposals and ask the PFBC to include these 146 streams into the Pennsylvania Class A Wild Trout Waters and Wild Trout Streams list.

*** Follow this link to the online form for public comment. ***

Case in Point

What Bill Anderson and the Little Juniata River Association have done for their own river serves as a prime example of what Class A distinction can lead to. I asked Bill how important the Class A distinction can be for a watershed, and here’s some of what he told me:

The capability to identify wild, self sustaining trout populations as a vehicle for attaining additional protection has been vital to our efforts to protect and improve the Little Juniata as a premiere brown trout fishery.


In 2006 we pointed PFBC to two of our Little J tributaries, Kettle Creek and Sandy Run. As a result of electroshocking surveys conducted in the fall of 2006, both streams were relisted as having Class A wild trout populations. The result was that (on the recommendation of PFBC) both streams received upgraded “Designated Use” by PADEP to “High Quality Cold Water” thus they were protected when developers sought to build 1500 houses on steep slopes in the Kettle Creek water shed and similarly protected from a 100 acre parking lot which would have drained into the Sandy Run wetlands.

Cheers, Bill! The Little Juniata River continues to improve due to the efforts of Bill Anderson and many others who have sought to gain the Class A Wild Trout designation for the Little J and its tributaries.

There are success stories like this all over the state.

Please take the time to encourage the PFBC to add these 146 streams to the Class-A Wild Trout and Wild Trout Streams Lists.

Here are links to each proposal:

(Use these titles as the “Title of Notice” on the online comment forms)

Proposed Changes to List of Class A Wild Trout Waters April 2017

Classification of Wild Trout Streams Proposed Additions, Revisions, and Removals April 2017

This two-page fact sheet from Trout Unlimited provides an excellent explanation of what is at stake, why it matters and what you can do.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

If you’ve ever smiled while releasing a wild trout, please take five minutes to fill out the online form.

*** Follow this link to the online form for comment. ***

Thank you. Together we’ll continue to protect and improve the waters that we all love so much.

Enjoy the day.
Domenick Swentosky

Share This Article . . .

Since 2014 and 600 articles deep
Troutbitten is a free resource for all anglers
Your support is greatly appreciated

– Explore These Post Tags –

Domenick Swentosky

Central Pennsylvania

Hi. I’m a father of two young boys, a husband, author, fly fishing guide and a musician. I fish for wild brown trout in the cool limestone waters of Central Pennsylvania year round. This is my home, and I love it. Friends. Family. And the river.

More from this Category

Troutbitten Opinion: Nicholas Meats, LLC vs Fishing Creek

Troutbitten Opinion: Nicholas Meats, LLC vs Fishing Creek

Fishing Creek is currently at risk for drastic increases in groundwater withdrawal by Nicholas Meats, LLC of Loganton, PA.

Troutbitten stands against this proposal and believes this operation will be detrimental to the sustained life of Fishing Creek, as well as the health and welfare of all living things that rely on it.

Please read and understand this dangerous issue, then do something to protect Fishing Creek . . .

What does it take to catch a big trout?

What does it take to catch a big trout?

For many years, I believed that it takes nothing special to catch a big trout. I argued with friends about this over beers, during baseball games, on drives to the river and through text messages at 1:00 am. My contention was always that big trout don’t require anything extraordinary to seal the deal. They need a quality drift, a good presentation, and if they are hungry they will eat it. I frequently pushed back against the notion that big wild trout were caught only with exceptional skill.

So for all who’ve heard me make this argument, I’d like to offer this revision: I still believe that large trout don’t need more than a good presentation. But what is GOOD may actually be pretty special. Meaning, it’s rare to find the skill level necessary to consistently get good drifts and put them over trout (large or small).

Here’s more . . .

Angler Types in Profile: The Gear Guy

Angler Types in Profile: The Gear Guy

I think every angler has some gear obsession. It’s part of us. Because fishing is the kind of activity that requires a lot of stuff. Big things and small. Clothing and boots, packs and boxes, lines and tools — and all the stuff that non-fishers never imagine when they think of a fishing pole. So it’s understandable that we pack our gear bags with stuff we know we need and then add in everything we think we might need. Time on the water is limited, and we want to feel prepared.

But nothing signals rookie more than a clean fisherman.

A Comprehensive List of Fishermen’s Excuses

A Comprehensive List of Fishermen’s Excuses

Fishermen are full of excuses for failure — because we get a lot of practice at not catching fish. Mostly, Troutbitten is here to share better ways to catch trout, but here’s a big list of explanations for when you don’t. Why’d you take the skunk? This list of reasons will help explain it all away.

These excuses can roughly be grouped into three classes:

Conditions — where you blame the weather or the water.
Fish’s Fault — where you blame the fish for not eating your flies.
I Wasn’t Really Trying — these excuses are centered around the inference that if you really wanted to, you could have caught more trout . . .

The Mismanagement of “Class A” Wild Trout

The Mismanagement of “Class A” Wild Trout

It’s time for the fish commission to truly protect, preserve and enhance our wild trout streams, whether that is easy, or whether it’s hard. Stop stocking over all Class A wild trout stream sections.

It’s the right thing to do. And sometimes, that’s where government policy should start . . .

Local Knowledge

Local Knowledge

You know the water level, clarity, the hatches, weather and more. That’s great. But local conditions are different from local knowledge. Here’s what I mean . . .

What do you think?

Be part of the Troutbitten community of ideas.
Be helpful. And be nice.


  1. I’ll probably take some heat for this. Class A designated streams are a great idea. It improves trout reproduction in many streams. But, sometimes, I think that designation is just a reason to stock less trout. Many waters thrive as Class A, but in many of those so designated waters, fish get no larger than a few inches long even though they are self-sustaining. All-in-all I think it’s a good plan.

    • Thanks for the input, Bruce. To me, it’s OK if those fish only get a few inches long. If that’s what the river naturally supports, then I’d rather see wild fish a few inches long than see trout stocked on top of them.

      But … I’ve seen small streams where the wild population really thrived once the stocking ended. In places that used to hold only a few small wild fish among the stocked ones, the wild fish now grow much larger and there’s a greater abundance once the stocking ended.

      I should note, though, that Class A Wild Trout designation does not always mean that stocking will end.

      Stocked or wild, though, is a secondary issue. More importantly, the Class A designation is a vital tool for the protections it can afford the river itself, as Bill Anderson explains above.

      • Many years ago, when I lived in New Jersey, I was fishing a small trout stream when i met another fisherman who loved close by, We got to talking and, when he realized that I was an ethical fly fisherman, he let me in on his secret. There was a bridge not far from where I was fishing, and that was the cutoff point of the state stocking program. In other words, they never stocked above the bridge. And that, he told me, is where the good fishing begins.

        I spent many a wonderful summer evening fishing the unstocked part of that little stream. Needless to say, it had many more fish, more quality fish, and healthier fish than the state stocked stretch. I also never ran into anyone there, except for my new friend.

  2. I agree, Domenick. I should clarify that I’m speaking only of streams that won’t produce trout year around.

  3. One stream I think would do really great without stocked fish is Yellow Creek.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Recent Articles

Recent Posts

Pin It on Pinterest